Jobs in agriculture and mining are often low paid, precarious and dangerous. Unions and collective bargaining are essential for improving conditions, but efforts to organise are often undermined by employers, informal and seasonal work contracts or prohibitive laws.
Excessive work hours are commonplace, both for small-scale farmers and farm workers. For example, in flower production in Ethiopia and Ecuador, overtime is often compulsory and not paid at all or at a premium rate. The same is reported by two-thirds of garment workers in India. Banana workers in Guatemala log 12 to 15 hours Monday through Friday, with a half-day of work on Saturday.
Injury and illness is common. Flower workers are prone to repetitive stress injuries from working in crouched and bent positions for long periods of time. More than 80% of cocoa producers in Ghana have experienced cuts, burns, back pain or other injuries. In bananas, just 20% of workers using pesticides use masks and/or gloves regularly.
Among artisanal gold miners, 25-33% of miners suffer from mercury vapor intoxication with various symptoms from headache and insomnia to kidney effects, respiratory failure and death. In processing mills, poor ventilation causes respiratory infections in sectors like cotton, cashew and rice in South Asia.
Informal and short-term work hinder access to social security and trade unions. Temporary tea workers in Kenya earn less than half of permanent employees and are ineligible for union membership. Informal seasonal work is particularly common on smallholder farms that mostly rely on family labour.
Animosity toward trade unions is widespread. One of the worst affected sectors is in bananas, where workers have been dismissed for participation in union activities and puppet unions create divisions, as documented in Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Peru. Latin American coffee plantations are riddled with similar violations. In India, caste discrimination means that union leaders do not always represent the interest of all tea estate workers.
Unionisation is also a hot topic at the consumption end of some supply chains. In the US, unionisation is low in the food and beverage industry.
Exploring Fairtrade’s Impact, 2022, page 31.
Fairtrade aims to fight the root causes of substandard working conditions. We believe in a worker-led approach where workers lead the negotiations to prevent, mitigate and remediate labour risks with the support of Fairtrade.
Fairtrade collaborates with labour rights organisations and others to achieve structural changes that advance the rights of all workers, not just those employed by Fairtrade certified farms and plantations. Our initiatives seek to drive change beyond the level of individual companies.
If a violation of a Fairtrade Standard requirement is found, the independent Fairtrade auditing body, FLOCERT, agrees on corrective actions with the organisation and checks their implementation.
Exploring Fairtrade’s Impact, 2022, page 26.
Fairtrade utilises a variety of tools to prevent and mitigate1 the risks regarding workers’ rights and the freedom of association at farmer cooperatives and plantations.
The Fairtrade Standards are one of these tools. Based on ILO conventions and recommendations, the Standards include several requirements on working conditions, which apply to workers employed both directly and indirectly via subcontractors:
To explore the full set of Fairtrade’s Standards on labour conditions and FOA, please see the bottom of this page.
Fairtrade also works in several other ways to improve working conditions and advance the freedom of association:
Please see also the page on living wage and Fairtrade’s responses to the lack of living wages.
At the export, import and manufacturing stages, Fairtrade’s interventions against labour abuse are currently narrower in scope than at the production stage. The Fairtrade Trader Standard requires companies to be aware of and comply with national labour laws and fundamental ILO Conventions, including those on freedom of association and collective bargaining. This applies in Fairtrade certified supply chains regardless of whether the local county has ratified these ILO Conventions or not. Compliance with these requirements is checked in audits, if there are prior indications of non-compliance, such as allegations made by third parties.
In addition, traders are required to pay Fairtrade Premium and Fairtrade Minimum Price, which support farmer cooperatives and plantations to invest in socio-economic development of the community and of workers.
1: Mitigating measures reduce the likelihood of an adverse impact (UNGP Interpretive Guidance, p. 12)
2: See further information on the website of Fairtrade International.
In spite of our efforts, labour rights violations can still occur in Fairtrade certified supply chains. Workers on farms and plantations remain among the most vulnerable groups in global trade. In many locations, progress is hampered by a vicious circle of poor working conditions, poverty, low levels of worker organisation and social dialogue, and unequal power dynamics between employers and workers.
When severe harm such as forced labour is identified or alleged, Fairtrade acts to protect the affected person(s) in line with our Protection Policy. We work with national agencies and/or NGOs to enable remediating3 measures, a safe workplace and long-term wellbeing of the affected person(s), and with producer organisation to strengthen preventive measures.
When FLOCERT, the independent Fairtrade auditing body, identifies a violation of a core labour requirement, it requires corrective measures. Typically, the organisation needs to rectify the violation and develop and implement a relevant policy, procedure or project to facilitate prevention of further violations. This may require the organisation to reverse an inappropriate termination of contract or start engaging in collective negotiations with trade unions. Corrective measures must be taken in a timely manner to avoid sanctions, which can include suspension and decertification.
For example, in Brazil, a 2020–2022 Fairtrade project supported orange farmer cooperatives to set up monitoring and remediation systems for poor labour conditions on their farms. The project aimed to increase the capacity of participating cooperatives to identify and adequately respond to poor working conditions and hiring practices, including issues of child and forced labour in productive areas. Please see Fairtrade’s Impact Map for further examples.
However, Fairtrade cannot guarantee that each violation is fully remediated, including rehabilitation and compensation for the victim. Full remediation requires contributions from all the duty bearers, including local public authorities and each of the companies who have caused or contributed to the case.
Fairtrade has a global level grievance mechanism – the allegations mechanism housed at FLOCERT – which is under reform to strengthen its alignment with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
In addition, Fairtrade certified plantations are required to have a grievance mechanism in place. Grievance mechanisms are not yet required of farmer cooperatives or traders, but these organisations do need to address and document any human rights and environmental complaints related to Fairtrade Standards.
3: Remediation refers to the process of counteracting or fixing a human rights violation through measures that can include apologies, restitution, rehabilitation, financial or non-financial compensation, and punitive sanctions, as well as preventing the repetition or further cases of harm (UNGP Interpretive Guide, p. 12).
Fairtrade Annual Report 2022, 2023, page 9.