Agri-food systems are responsible for 31% of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, according to the FAO. Depending on the product, major sources of emissions include the clearing of land, fertilizer use, processing, transportation or retail.
Deforestation is a significant contributor to climate change and mainly caused by the clearing of land for agriculture – 73% of all global deforestation is caused by agricultural expansion.
Tropical rainforests are critical to the planet’s survival and have among the highest carbon storage of any ecosystem. Although the commodities responsible for the bulk of deforestation – soy, beef and palm oil – are not in Fairtrade’s portfolio, cocoa and coffee have significant impacts on tropical rainforests. The most affected areas include the Upper Guinean Rainforest in West Africa, the Amazon in Latin America, and rainforests across in Southeast Asia. In the Amazon, another leading driver of deforestation is gold mining.
Slash and burn techniques are still used by some agricultural producers, for example in banana production in the Philippines.
Fertilisers often contain nitrous oxide — the third-largest contributor to climate change. While correct fertiliser application can improve output, overuse leads to higher emissions and higher costs for farmers without further improvements to yields. Globally, fertilizer use is particularly high in East and South Asia and prevalent in commodities like maize, rice, wheat and vegetables .
Harmful emissions are also produced by other farm operations. Fossil fuels help run machinery. Traditional sugarcane production involves burning cane fields prior to harvesting. In traditional rice paddies, the soil is covered in water and deprived of oxygen, which releases methane gas, making rice production accountable for 1.2% of all global greenhouse gas emissions. In coffee processing, the pulp generated when coffee cherries are processed can produce notable methane emissions, if handled improperly.
The choice of a production method can cut emissions significantly. Kenyan Fairtrade roses available on European markets, for example, have a significantly lower climate footprint than Dutch gas-heated greenhouse-grown roses, even if the former are transported by air.
Nevertheless, for many products, most carbon emissions accrue in the later stages in the supply chain. In cotton and wine, for example, many of the later production stages are energy intensive. While cotton production is estimated to contribute less than 1% of total global carbon emissions, the global fashion industry accounts for 3-10% of all emissions.
In the wine industry, transport is responsible for 55-65% of the generated carbon emissions, while the rest accrues from glass bottles, heavy machinery and the specific temperature necessary for wine storage. As such, many Chilean wines are now transported by sea, which causes significantly fewer emissions than air freight.
Exploring Fairtrade’s Impact, 2020, page 34.
Although smallholder agriculture causes relatively few emissions, agriculture as a whole is a leading contributor to land use changes that drive climate change. Climate change also has a dramatic impact on the livelihood of many farmer households.
Climate resilience for farmers, workers and their organisations is a core goal in Fairtrade’s global strategy. We are currently strengthening Fairtrade’s policies and work on climate change and environmental sustainability, guided by a new Centre of Excellence and strategy for climate and the environment.
Importantly, Fairtrade’s Producer Networks in Africa, Asia and Latin America have developed a common approach for climate change mitigation and adaptation work.
Fairtrade utilises a variety of approaches to promote climate change mitigation1 at farmer organisations and plantations. The Fairtrade Standards are one of the approaches and include several requirements related to climate change:
Please see the water biodiversity page for further information. In total, environmental criteria account for one quarter and one third of all criteria for farmer organisations and plantations, respectively. In recent years, Fairtrade has expanded the number and scope of environmental criteria for all farmer organisations, and particularly for those producing coffee or cocoa. We are currently reviewing and strengthening the environmental requirements for all traders, all plantations, and bananas.
Nevertheless, standards’ requirements and auditing alone are insufficient to address climate change. That is why Fairtrade approaches climate change issues in several ways, including:
At the export, import and manufacturing stages, issues of transport-related emissions are increasingly important. Fairtrade supports pilot projects to reduce emissions along the supply chains, including testing to replace air transport for flowers with sea transport, potentially allowing for reduction on transport-related emissions by at least 75%.
The Fairtrade Trader Standard further requires companies to be aware of applicable laws on energy use, climate emissions and environment in general, and show no evidence of violations. Compliance with these requirements is checked in audits if there are any prior indications of non-compliance4.
In addition, traders must comply with Fairtrade’s pricing and Premium requirements, which allow farmer organisations and plantations to invest in environmental sustainability. Traders are also encouraged to reduce their carbon footprint and other negative environmental impacts.
1: Mitigating measures reduce the likelihood of an adverse impact (UNGP Interpretive Guide, p. 12). In the context of climate change, mitigation refers to reduction or greenhouse gas emissions or removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
2: Mainlevel Consulting, 2022, Assessing the Impact of Fairtrade on Poverty Reduction and Economic Resilience through Rural Development.
3: Compensating the carbon emissions of a specific supply chain through certified carbon credits generated at the origin of that same supply chain.
4: Indications can be obtained e.g. via allegations made by third parties or via observations during trader audits.
Every human being has a right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. This was confirmed by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 26 July 2022. Climate protection has also been recognised as a human right by several courts, including the German Constitutional Court (2021).
However, it is still very rare for victims of climate change – or weak government or corporate action on climate change – to gain remediation5.
Small-scale farming households are among those who contribute the least to climate change, yet suffer the greatest impacts. Agricultural productivity has already suffered from climate change, which is spurring drought, desertification, and wildfires on the one hand and heavy rains, floods, and erosion on the other6.
The adverse impacts of climate change are ecological, social and economic. For millions of farmers, the ecological changes make growing seasons shorter and more unpredictable. This endangers the nutrition, health, education, standard of living and social standing of farmers, their families, and their communities. It also dramatically affects the global supply chains of food.
Overall, Fairtrade producers flag climate change as the biggest risk they face.
Fairtrade seeks to support farmers, workers and their organisations build resilience and adapt to climate change. In our climate-related training and capacity building work, we explore how farmers can adapt agricultural methods to the changing climate. Demonstration plots are used to test different ways of pruning, fertilising, irrigating and gaining shade and provide visible evidence of how farmers can improve their practices.
Fairtrade Premium and climate change adaptation projects funded by public donors or companies also support adaptation measures by farmers, workers and their communities. The Fairtrade Carbon Credit projects bring additional climate funding from downstream business partners. These projects always establish a grievance mechanism, in order that any disputes can be solved early and lessons can be learnt from any grievances.
5: Remediation refers to the process of counteracting or fixing a human rights violation through measures that can include apologies, restitution, rehabilitation, financial or non-financial compensation, and punitive sanctions, as well as preventing the repetition or further cases of harm (UNGP Interpretive Guide, p. 12).
6: See for example Campbell, Läderach and Pacillo, 2021. Exploring the Nexus between Climate Change and Human Rights; and UNEP 2015, Climate Change and Human Rights.
Cocoa Farmer Emelia Deborah from Sankore. Ghana. Fairtrade climate change projects, 2021, page 30.